![]() ![]() I also have SE to play with that one of my friends bought but lacks time to actually use so I have tried to slowly learn SE also.īeing a user of LspCad and a beginner of SE this is what I can point out this far as the biggest differences between the two. I have also been a LspCad user for quite a few years now - I started with LspCad 5 Std and now the LspCad 6 Pro. And let us know about the projects you're working on- there's lots of different builders here with all kinds of experience and different philosophies - you're bound to run into folks who can help you with the learning curve in the direction you want to go. powerful tools produce powerful results only when used with informed decision and insight. I will say that to get the most out of either, you should be prepared to learn a modicum of physics and electrical theory- otherwise, you'll be doing a bit of wandering around in the woods barking your shins on things you didn't even see. ![]() I've heard comments from a few folks that LspCAD 6 is easier than the latest Soundeasy versions to get the gist of, but that's just hearsay. I don't think I"m in the position to make a judgement one way or the other on which might be better for you- If you can, I'd suggest downloading demo's of both and playing with them, as well as reading the manuals. I've owned two versions of Soundeasy, and I've owned/own two versions of LspCAD I've only been using LspCAD for the last 4 or 5 years, but that's just because "I" liked the feature set and how it worked for me and my working style. Neither has a trivial learning curve, and you'll probably get as many different opinions as to the degree and complexity. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |